Author Archive CPoSD76

The government of Alberta must protect children from the physical & psychological sexual abuse of gender ideology.

  • Given the mountains of evidence that gender transition brings serious and irreversible harm, and in some cases death, to those that have been subjected to it.
  • Given the cases of James Younger and the unnamed girl in BC who’s father is being forced to call a boy.
  • Given the case of a mother suing her child’s ‘transition’ team for lying about the harm and side affects of cross-sex hormones and puberty blockers.
  • Given the parents who are suing their School for interfering in the normal sexual development of their child by promoting sexual transitions to their child without their prior knowledge or consent.
  • Given the blatant evidence that multiple public libraries are explicitly involved in the sexual grooming of children with “Drag Queen Story Hours”
  • Given that doctors in Ontario have openly accepted payment in order to cut the healthy breasts off of 13 & 14 year old girls.
  • Given that the Senate wishes to outlaw preventing children from transitioning, and publicly stating “mouth to ear” that there is only 2 sexes.
  • Given that communities like St. Albert and Fort Mac, Alberta have stepped outside their legitimate authority as municipalities and proceeded to willfully violate the inalienable rights of Albertans, and Canadians with unlawful bylaws that ban “Conversion Therapy.”
  • Given that the LGBT wish to force all children to accept the lie that they can become homosexual or transgender, but not become straight or ‘cis’.
  • And given that over 90% of Alberta’s schools promote and enforce gender ideology to some extent on Children as young as 5.

It is high time that the MLAs in Alberta do their duty and stop behaving like cowards, and protect Alberta’s children from such openly malicious, exploitative, and sexually abusive individuals that advocate for gender transition and gender identity ideology. If they can not do this most basic duty of governance, then they should step down, and let someone who does have the courage and conviction to protect our nations most vulnerable, do it instead. If they will not step up, nor will they step down, than their governance is illegitimate.

We are calling on you, the people of Alberta to write your MLA today, and remind them of their duty. Inform them of your concern for the welfare of Alberta’s children, and request that they table a law in this very session of legislature that would:

“criminalize any action by any individual or agency, foreign or domestic, to promote or provide gender transition surgeries or medications, or to encourage gender transition in any form of media, for any child not of the age of majority.”

We also recommend that you request that the penalties for violating such a law be stiff and include a permanent record.

As reported by Life Site News, people are dying by the thousands from ‘transition’ medications, and it is either negligent or malicious for our government to allow those medications to be promoted without hindrance to children in our schools or other public institutions. It is also massively hypocritical for gender transitions to be promoted while dire warnings of death and deformity are being spread over concerns with activities like ‘vaping’. So please, write your MLA today.

The castration, sterilization, mutilation, deforming, and sexual molestation of children conducted by adherents of gender ideology should be a crime of the most heinous order. And nothing short of a complete ban and criminalisation of such is acceptable in any civilized society. Absent of such protections, we are neither civilized, nor a society worth saving.

Tags, , , , , , , , ,

This can happen to your child in SD76

6-Year-Old ‘Disciplined’ For ‘Misgendering’ A Transgender Classmate

Procedures for SD76’s policy 621 states that if your child is NOT at school, and violates school policy, then that child can be punished for violating school policy. Procedures for policy 622 states every child must be AFFIRMED in their gender confusion, and that it is an offense to present contrary evidence.
THUS any child who shows ‘transphobia’ at home or at the mall, will be punished at school.
Ross Glen Elementary recently published in a school newsletter that ‘adults were taught wrong’ and that a child as young as 3 could be transgender.

You have THE RIGHT to teach your child your own values, and as long as those values are within the law.

SD76 DOES NOT have the right NOR the AUTHORITY to punish your children for any action taken off of school property.

SD76 DOES NOT have the right NOR the AUTHORITY to impose a moral an ethical standard beyond the law upon you or your children.

SD76 IS SUBJECT TO the Family Law Act, and YOUR PRIOR RIGHTS as parents.

YOU have the right to bring charges against any staff member or employee of SD76, should they violate any part of the family law act, or your rights as a parent.

Tags, , , ,

PCE Candidate Survey

Parents for Choice in Education (PCE) has released a survey asking key question of candidates for school board in October 2017’s Municipal Elections. How the candidates answer those questions will provide key information to electorate on where all candidates stand on the education issues that are at the forefront of the coming election.

PCE_Survey Direct Download

The CPoSD76 will be doing profiles on all candidates who put their names forward on Sept 18th, and giving an A to F grade on if the CPoSD76 endorse that candidate for the position of Trustee in the Medicine Hat Public School District. In order for a Candidate to have a passing grade, they must at a minimum have completed and returned the PCE survey.

The CPoSD76 are of the position that if any candidate can not fill out the survey, and provide direct and honest answers to the questions most concerning to electorate in Medicine hat, then they will receive an ‘F’ on their profile.

The CPoSD76 would also like to thank PCE for providing electorate all across Alberta with the tools they need to make informed decisions on who they will put in Fiduciary charge of their children.

Our children are the future, and giving them the best possible education and the most prosperous future are the most important goals for parents.

Tags, , , , ,

Media Release Regarding SD76’s second rejection of the CPoSD76 petition.

 

On July 21, the CPoSD76 submitted additional information to the Secretary of SD76 at his request. Our previous submission on July 7th was in compliance with the proceedings of the court appeal on March 10th, 2017.

Our submission on July 21st was an attempt to work with the Board to have it meet new requirements set out by the Secretary, that were not in fact discussed during the appeal proceedings.

In regards to the response by the Secretary for our July 21 Submission:

  1. We did not receive back from the Secretary the original of the petition from September 2016, and a copy of that original is all we had to work with. The “penciling in” as CHAT news put it was in fact at the request of the Superintendent and Chair of the Board on July 7th. The addresses were those of the signatures that had previously only had a postal code, and they were filled in with RED INK so as to not mistake them as being originally on the petition. This of course could have been told to CHAT had they made any real effort to get a response from the CPoSD76 prior to releasing their one sided story.
  2. The insinuation by the Secretary that we had ‘made up’ or ‘falsified’ signatures or address is a slanderous accusation with no truth to it. Everything we have done has been above reproach, and again, Justice Tilleman specifically asked the Legal council if the Board or Secretary had concerns with the witnesses or integrity of the signatures, and the Legal council stated that they did not. The CPoSD76 take exception to the suggestion, and are considering appropriate responses.
  3. The Secretary rejected all the effort that the CPoSD76 went to get the information for the postal code signatures, and the CPoSD76 believe that they were deliberately mislead during the appeal process. The CPoSD76 do not believe that the Board and Secretary have honoured the statements made to the Justice during the March 10th appeal proceedings.
  4. The CPoSD76 have seen continued obstruction from the Board and Secretary in regards to the petition, and do not believe that any petition would be accepted at any time. This is evident through the changing requirements, and the acceptance and then rejection of signatures, the continued miss characterization of facts and numbers, and repeated misrepresentations of the intentions and concerns of the CPoSD76.

Despite chairman Massini’s assertions that the matter is closed, and that we must “start over,” the CPoSD76 do not hold that same position. During the March 10th appeal Justice Tilleman invited the petitioners to return to his court room, should the district reject the petition a second time. The CPoSD76 are considering all options.

Tags, , , ,

Daily Tidbit

No quote today